Peer Review Policies & Practices
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Logo
 
Grants and Funding
Grants Policy
Policy & Guidance
Compliance & Oversight
Research Involving Human Subjects
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)
Animals in Research
Peer Review Policies & Practices
Intellectual Property Policy
Acknowledging NIH Funding
Invention Reporting (iEdison)
NIH Public Access
Research Integrity
Peer Review Policies & Practices

On This Page:

Photo of Obama

"To maintain our edge . . . we've got to protect our rigorous peer review system and ensure that we only fund proposals that promise the biggest bang for taxpayer dollars . . . that's what's going to maintain our standards of scientific excellence for years to come."

Remarks by President Barack Obama on the 150th Anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences, April 29, 2013

What's New in Peer Review

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Continuous Submission The continuous submission policy has been changed. Read more ...

Experiments in Peer Review The NIH is undertaking several new experiments that involve the peer review process (See Collins and Tabak, Nature 505: 612-613).

Research Involving Chimpanzees The interim agency policy for NIH extramural and intramural research involving chimpanzees has been updated. See NOT-OD-14-024.

Back to Top

Information for Reviewers

How to Volunteer.  Consider volunteering to serve in the NIH peer review process.  See Becoming a Peer Reviewer.

Incentives for Reviewers: Continuous Submission.  Certain reviewers may be eligible for Continuous Submission.

Materials for Reviewers.  Standardized guidelines, instructions, and critique templates that reviewers use are posted at Guidelines for Reviewers.

Protecting NIH Grant Applications.  Reviewers must take every reasonable precaution to safeguard NIH grant applications and related materials, which are considered highly confidential.  See: 

Maintaining Confidentiality.  Each NIH reviewer must certify that s/he has read and will abide by the NIH confidentiality and nondisclosure rules.  See Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review.

  • NOT-OD-14-069 (3/28/2014): Maintaining Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review

Declaring Lobbyist Status.  Each NIH reviewer must certify that s/he is not a federally-registered lobbyist before participating in NIH peer review.  See OFACP Policy of September 2012.

Managing Conflicts of Interest.  Each NIH reviewer must certify that s/he has declared all known conflicts of interest before the review meeting, and after the meeting, that s/he did not participate in the evaluation of an application with which s/he has a conflict of interest.  See:

Evaluating Human Embryonic Stem Cells.  In assessing overall impact, reviewers evaluate the scientific appropriateness of proposed hESC lines or the justification for using a cell line that is not listed on the NIH Registry for Stem Cells.  See NOT-OD-12-111 (6/11/2012).

Back to Top

Information for Applicants

Overview of Peer Review.  For a general overview of NIH peer review, visit Peer Review Process, or see Core Values of NIH Peer Review for a more detailed understanding. 

Regulations Governing NIH Peer Review. View 42 CFR 52h: Scientific Peer Review of Research Grant Applications and Research and Development Contract Projects:

Appeals of NIH Initial Peer Review.  The NIH policy and procedure for handling appeals of the outcome of initial peer review are explained in:

  • NOT-OD-11-064 (04/15/2011): Appeals of Initial Peer Review
  • NOT-OD-11-101 (7/29/2011): Resubmission of Applications with Pending Appeals of NIH Initial Peer Review

Post-submission Materials.The NIH accepts certain materials and videos as application materials after the application has been submitted but before peer review.  See:

  • NOT-OD-13-030 (1/29/2013): Reminders and Updates: NIH Policy on Post-Submission Application Materials
  • NOT-OD-12-141 (9/27/2012): Interim Guidance for Videos Submitted as NIH Application Materials
  • NOT-OD-12-111 (6/11/2012): Notice of Impending Change in Peer Review Criteria and Submission Requirements for NIH Applications Involving Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Advisory Councils or Boards. NIH Advisory Councils and Boards perform the second level of NIH peer review, and make recommendations to the Institutes and Centers.  See:

  • NOT-OD-12-140 (8/20/2012): Notice of NIH Special Council Review of Research Applications from PDs/PIs with More than $1.0 Million Direct Costs in Annual NIH Support

Back to Top



Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.


Related Resources
 

This page last updated on March 28, 2014
Content Manager: ReviewPolicyOfficer@mail.nih.gov
Technical Issues: E-mail OER Webmaster

Social Media Links