National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Funding Opportunity Title
NINDS Stroke Trials Network - National Clinical Coordinating Center (U01)
U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number
Companion Funding Opportunity
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s)
Funding Opportunity Purpose
The purpose of this funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is to invite applications to participate as a National Clinical Coordinating Center for the NINDS Stroke Trials Network. The primary goal of this network is to maximize efficiencies to develop, promote and conduct high-quality, multi-site exploratory phase 1, 2 and confirmatory phase 3 clinical trials focused on key interventions, as well as biomarker-validation studies that are immediately preparatory to trials, in stroke prevention, treatment, and recovery with the objective to have a balanced portfolio between all three approaches. The network will include multiple regional coordinating stroke centers with strong collaborative relationships between vascular neurology, emergency medicine, interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurointensive care, neuroimaging, stroke rehabilitation, and pediatric neurology that is coordinated through separate National Clinical Coordinating and Data Management Centers. Efficiency will be encouraged through the use of master trial agreements and a central IRB. Clinical and basic scientists at the regional coordinating stroke centers will contribute to the development of network clinical trial applications for peer review, as well as planning for execution of NINDS-funded clinical trial applications from outside of the network, including trials that result from Collaborative Research and Development Agreements between the NINDS and Industry partners. The Network will also be uniquely poised to rapidly collaborate with other existing networks, such as the NINDS Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network (NETT) or international consortia to conduct larger, definitive trials of promising interventions for the treatment of stroke.
This FOA solicits applications for the National Clinical Coordinating Center for the Stroke Trials Network. Separate FOAs will be issued to solicit applications for the Regional Coordinating Stroke Centers (RFA-NS-13-011) and the National Data Management Center (TBD).
February 21, 2013
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
May 4, 2013
Letter of Intent Due Date(s)
April 1, 2013
Application Due Date(s)
June 4, 2013, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
AIDS Application Due Date(s)
Scientific Merit Review
Advisory Council Review
Earliest Start Date
June 5, 2013
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
The purpose of this funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is to invite applications to participate as a National Clinical Coordinating Center (NCC) for the NINDS Stroke Trials Network. The network will develop and conduct high-quality, multi-site phase 1, 2 and phase 3 clinical trials focused on key interventions in stroke prevention, treatment, and recovery. The network will consider the breadth of cerebrovascular disease beginning with patients identified with acute stroke through stroke rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention for pediatric and adult patients.
The network will provide a robust, standardized, and accessible infrastructure to facilitate rapid development and implementation of NINDS-funded stroke trials. It will include multiple regional coordinating stroke centers (RCC) and their affiliated stroke centers with a proven track record of enrolling stroke patients into clinical studies, one NCC, and one National Data Management Center (DMC). The network is designed to increase the efficiency of stroke clinical trials by facilitating patient recruitment and retention, supporting novel methodologies and streamlined approaches to accelerate the development of promising stroke therapies, and enabling comparison between approaches.
Stroke is a disabling, often fatal and expensive disorder that is a major public health burden. Globally it is the second leading cause of death, but in North America stroke has fallen to the fourth most common cause of mortality as the result of ongoing successes in prevention and acute care. Vascular disease of the brain can manifest not only as overt stroke but also as silent infarction and diffuse white matter disease with cognitive and functional decline. Stroke is a syndrome, with two broad types (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and with multiple possible underlying causes. Although stroke impacts all age groups (including children and especially neonates), the incidence is strongly linked to aging. Stroke will become increasingly prominent in the next 30 years with the projected rise in the proportion of elderly in the US, and it will impose an even more significant toll on individuals, families, and society.
NIH-funded basic, translational and clinical research offers the promise to reduce the burden of stroke.
The Stroke Progress Review Group and NINDS stroke planning efforts identified a need for stroke trial network infrastructure to effectively pursue a number of scientific opportunities and to accelerate translation (see http://www.ninds.nih.gov/find_people/ninds/OSPP/Stroke-Research-Priorities-Meeting-2012.htm). The unbiased evaluation of newly-developed and existing interventions-drugs, devices and systems of care-in randomized, controlled clinical trials are necessary to establish efficacy of interventions for improving important clinical outcomes. Phase 1, 2 trials explore safety, target engagement, proof of biological concept, and dose response to inform phase 3 efficacy trials. Phase 3 efficacy trials are designed to demonstrate clinical benefit that patients consider meaningful. Comparative effectiveness trials examine how to best apply established efficacious treatments.
Investigators in the NINDS Stroke Trials Network will forge collaborations to engage in the planning, development and execution of innovative trials designed to best answer the highest priority scientific questions for advancing stroke treatment. The success of the network's phase 1, 2 activities will be enhanced by strong relationships with preclinical experts in the basic science of cerebrovascular disorders. The investigators will be expected to judge the feasibility of the network’s performance of trials designed outside the network as well as to develop original grant applications for submission to NINDS peer review.
Biomarkers, especially neuroimaging markers of vascular pathology, brain ischemia, or recovery after injury, have been developed for stroke research. Biomarker-validation studies that are immediately preparatory to trials will also be considered by the Stroke Network. The potential applications of biomarkers are to guide early neuroprotective and reperfusion interventions, to monitor neuroplasticity in stroke recovery, and to expedite therapy development. Some biomarkers have been validated in multi-center studies, but their full potential to impact research awaits standardization and adoption across a clinical trials network.
Clinical trials require a network of experienced clinical researchers, data management, clinical trial personnel, as well as infrastructure for data capture and storage, and the recruitment and retention of participating patients. Clinical trials are time consuming and expensive, often requiring as much as 10 years or more to complete. These constraints can drain the resources of funding agencies, investigators, industry, clinical resources, and patients and may discourage innovative strategies and collaborations with industry and international stroke trial consortia intent on achieving common goals.
In the traditional model, a consortium of clinical sites is created for each new multi-center trial. This leads to redundancy because infrastructure resources are duplicated. Also, time is lost when common start-up activities are repeated for each trial. Multiple, uncoordinated contract negotiations and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals often cause further delays and create challenges for industry partnerships. This is especially critical given industry's perception that new stroke therapies are too difficult and risky to pursue. Therefore, highly meritorious, peer reviewed clinical trials developed under Collaborative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) between NINDS and industry partners may also be performed by the network.
Another limitation of the traditional research model is that it is difficult to access and combine data across trials to enable meta-analysis and the development of new research questions. A major opportunity for the network is to coordinate and integrate data across the spectrum of NINDS funded stroke trial research. This and the use of Stroke Common Data elements (CDE's) will ensure synchronized and uniform collection of clinical, neuroimaging and biological data, and it will potentially lead to innovative new methods such as the integration of patient reported outcomes or electronic health record data in large, "pragmatic", clinical trials. Comparison of results across studies and for metadata analysis would increase the value of collected data, and thus the contribution of study participants.
Lastly, without an ongoing trial network, there may be loss of expertise and real-world clinical knowledge as stand-alone trials finish. The lack of consistent activity at a site may lead experienced research coordinators to move to other fields after a trial is completed. The NINDS Stroke Trials Network will enable the integration of lessons learned from previous or ongoing trials to ensure successful, impactful clinical research. Involvement in most NINDS-funded stroke trials will allow the development of an experienced clinical stroke trial workforce and enhance stroke research training.
Stroke care requires contributions from a variety of health professionals across multiple disciplines. Lack of integration of these multiple components into an effective stroke research infrastructure limits the ability of NIH-funded research to advance the care of stroke victims. The stroke trials network will be expected to integrate the various stroke-related disciplines and develop and execute interdisciplinary research applications that answer questions with high public health impact. The interdisciplinary nature of the NINDS Stroke Trials Network will also serve to build research capabilities that match the scientific opportunities across the spectrum of stroke research.
The network aims to harness multidisciplinary stroke expertise to collaboratively and efficiently conduct exploratory NINDS-sponsored phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for stroke interventions with the goal to quickly move potential treatments into larger, confirmatory phase 3 trials. In addition, the network may perform biomarker validation studies that are immediately preparatory to clinical trial(s). Collaboration with the NETT or international consortia will facilitate the execution of the larger, phase 3 definitive trials. Together with the larger U.S. and international stroke research community, stroke patients, and stroke-related nonprofit associations, the investigators at the RCC's will work to design and execute the most clinically impactful stroke research.
Study execution and performance will be monitored by the NINDS and the National Clinical Coordinating and Data Management Centers to ensure that all eligible stroke patients are considered for NINDS-funded trials.
Once the network has been established, the NINDS expects that it will be the primary and first-line infrastructure involved in implementing all multi-site stroke trials submitted to the NINDS.
The NINDS Stroke Trials Network will include: one NCC, one DMC and up to 25 RCC's that have the capacity of coordinating activities in a large number of Stroke Centers across the United States. This FOA solicits applications for funding of infrastructure for the NCC. The additional project-specific funds to support the implementation of protocols conducted in the network will be from separate awards. Projects may come from academic investigators, from small business or industry through a CRADA or from the NINDS through a specific funding opportunity announcement. Collaborative projects developed by investigators in the network will be strongly encouraged. These funds will be distributed to the RCC via the NCC on a per-patient basis, according to protocol budgets approved by the network Steering Committee (SC) and via master trial agreements with the RCC's. The NCC must be willing to follow this funding arrangement for each trial protocol conducted in the Network.
It is advantageous if the NINDS Stroke Trials Network consider working with a central IRB which will be implemented by the CCC similar to the NeuroNEXT (NINDS Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials) model (see as an example NeuroNEXT.org for the IRB reliance agreements and master trial agreements used in NeuroNEXT). The actual templates to be used in the stroke network may be different from the ones used in NeuroNext. The CCC will have to coordinate a central IRB of record and manage all required IRB communication and documentation including but not limited to tracking approval, maintaining regulatory documents, communicating with the local IRBs, and handling adverse event reporting and notifications.
For large, simple, acute stroke trials the NCC or DMC of the NINDS Stroke Trials Network may collaborate with the NINDS Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trial (NETT) network to coordinate trial activities. The network should also be able to conduct trials in adult populations, pediatric populations, or both, and it should have a rapid stroke system to treat and enroll patients within the first couple hours of a stroke. The NIH Clinical Center may also function as an additional clinical site.
Responsibilities of the National Clinical Coordinating Center include, but are not limited to:
During the Conceptual Phase of each potential new network project, the CCC is responsible for:
During the Implementation Phase, the NCC is responsible for:
During the Analysis and Publication Phase, the NCC is responsible for:
National Data Management Center
The DMC will support protocol data management, data quality control (including data monitoring), and undertake interim monitoring, analyses and reporting for the Clinical Coordinating Center, NINDS, and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs). The DMC will also initiate and coordinate activities to promote standardization of data elements using the NINDS Stroke Common Data Elements and support sharing of de-identified data. The funding announcement describing the responsibilities of the network DMC will be released subsequent to this FOA.
Regional Coordinating Stroke Centers
The RCC's selected for funding in the network will have both clinical science excellence and specialized expertise in stroke management, a strong background in stroke research, and a proven ability to recruit stroke patients that include patients from various racial and ethnic groups. Each RCC will include stroke specialists from neurology, pediatric neurology, emergency medicine, neurosurgery, neuroimaging, interventional radiology, neurointensive care, neurorehabilitation, and other medicine specialists and emergency medical services. The RCCs will propose, develop, and conduct protocols, recruit patients, and disseminate research findings. Each RCC will be expected to take part in multiple concurrent protocols. All individual RCCs will be required to participate in a cooperative and interactive manner with one another and with the NCC.
A typical RCC in the network is envisioned as a regional academic medical center or tertiary care facility capable of providing research support for its collaborative stroke centers. RCCs may choose to include geographically or organizationally linked partners or satellite stroke centers, such as other academic centers and/or private and community hospitals and clinics. Such satellite stroke centers could be venues for additional patient enrollment or might provide access to patient populations not traditionally cared for at the RCC. The RCC will be responsible for providing scientific leadership and regular communication to satellite centers regarding protocols and study progress and for providing administrative and budget support for protocol initiation. In addition, preclinical stroke activities at the RCC's will contribute to the development of compelling phase 1 and 2 research applications and also enhance training opportunities. All centers will be strongly encouraged to increase the value of clinical research data through an aggressive data sharing.
The NINDS will be responsible for organizing and providing overall support for the network. The NINDS Office of Clinical Research staff and the NINDS Office of Grants Management will be responsible for the overall management of the network. In addition to regular grant stewardship, an NINDS Project Scientist will be involved substantially with the awardees as a NINDS partner, consistent with the Cooperative Agreement mechanism. The NINDS will appoint the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB). The SAB is an external group of experts who will review the network program and provide individual feedback to the network investigators and the NINDS.
1. An Operations Committee for the network will consist of the PD/PI of the NCC (who will serve as chair), a co-PD/PI, if designated, the PD/PI of the DMC, the NINDS Project Scientist, NINDS Program Official, and selected PD/PI's or their designees from the RCC's. The Operations Committee will oversee all the network's activities and monitor performance. It is anticipated the Operations committee will meet by telephone conference calls on a weekly basis.
2. A Steering Committee (SC) will consist of the PDs/PIs of the NCC and DMC, the NINDS Project Scientist, and the PD/PI or their designees from each of the RCC's. The Steering Committee will be the main governing body of the network's scientific operation and conduct.
Over the next 5-year project period, the network will initiate approximately 4-5 NINDS-funded exploratory phase 1 and2 stroke clinical trials and 2-4 phase 3 trials. The exact number of protocols supported will depend on the nature and extent of the investigations proposed and the availability of funds. Projects proposed to and conducted through the network may come from the collaboration of investigators within the network, from investigators outside of the network, or from a CRADA between the NINDS and an Industry partner. The network may also be used to conduct NINDS-funded projects that were initiated before the network was established. Informed by the results of ongoing research and the stroke planning effort it is anticipated that a number of projects will be solicited by NINDS to be performed in the network. Projects may also be submitted using the standard NINDS clinical trial funding announcements (e.g., PAR-10-199: NINDS Exploratory Clinical Trials (R01) or PAR-11-173: NINDS PHASE III Investigator-Initiated Multi-Site Clinical Trials (U01)). Future funding announcements by the NINDS for the solicitation for network trials may also be developed.
Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities.
Application Types Allowed
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
NIH intends to fund one (1) award under this FOA, corresponding to a total of $2,250,000 for fiscal year 2013. Future year amounts will depend on annual appropriations.
The expected direct cost for individual awards is up to $1.5 M for 5 years.
Award Project Period
The project period is limited to 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are
not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
Applicant organizations must complete the following registrations as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. Applicants must have a valid Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in order to begin each of the following registrations.
All Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
must also work with their institutional officials to register with the eRA
Commons or ensure their existing eRA Commons account is affiliated with the eRA
Commons account of the applicant organization.
All registrations must be completed by the application due date. Applicant organizations are strongly encouraged to start the registration process at least 6 weeks prior to the application due date.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources
necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal
Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Only one NCC application per institution (normally identified by having a unique DUNS number or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
Investigators at the NCC institution are strongly encouraged to also apply for a RCC award (RFA-NS-13-011). However, it is preferred that the NCC and a RCC at the same institution be led by separate PD/PI's to ensure that the NCC activities as well as the local RCC activities receive full attention.
Awards for a NCC and a DMC will not be made to the same PD/PI to ensure that data analyses and data acquisition are performed independently.
NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed within the past thirty-seven months (as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement), except for submission:
Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the “Apply for Grant Electronically” button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.gov.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
Scott Janis, Ph.D.
Neuroscience Center, Room 2191, MSC 9520
6001 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, MD 20852 (courier)
Bethesda, MD 20892-9520
The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, mandatory and optional. Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this FOA. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate “optional” components.
All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed, with the following exception:
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions.
Facilities and Other Resources:
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
The PD/PI for the NCC will be a clinical trials expert with a track record in successfully coordinating and implementing stroke clinical trials:
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
A detailed budget for the NCC should be presented. The budget must include all activities delineated in the list of NCC responsibilities included in this FOA.
All activities related to coordinating at least 6-8 clinical trials, should be budgeted, including:
The release of funds will be milestone-driven, according to milestones pre-specified in the Notice of Grant Award.
Research Strategy: The Research Strategy must consist of the following Sections A – I.
A) Leadership Plan
The PD/PI should describe how stroke trials and research will be strategically supported by the NCC. The PD/PI should describe the expertise and track record of the research staff, the NCCs SOPs, how tasks will be delegated and supervised, and how the team will communicate. The PD/PI should describe how all aspects of complex multi-center trials will be supported by the NCC. Note that the NCC will be responsible for registering all trials with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
B) Collaboration Plan
Applicants should state their general support of collaborative research and their willingness to participate in a collaborative and interactive manner with the RCC's, the DMC, and NINDS and its partners (both academic and industry partners) in all aspects of the network program. Applicants are encouraged to describe any special expertise or unique strengths they can offer to the collaborative effort (e.g., experience in clinical trial collaborations with industry partners or patient groups) and their history and experience in submitting stroke clinical trial applications to the NINDS. The applicant should indicate how potential network project investigators (from academia or industry) will be motivated to work with the network, supported in the conception phase, and integrated into the network in the planning and implementation phases. Applicants should also demonstrate their ability to establish strong collaborative relationships between vascular neurology, emergency medicine, interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurointensive care, neuroimaging, stroke rehabilitation, and pediatric neurology. Applicants should also indicate their willingness to attend all network investigator meetings, which will include conference calls one- two times a month and in-person meetings at least one-two times a year.
C) Recruitment and Outreach Plan
The PD/PI should describe plans for supporting recruitment of stroke patients at the clinical sites, including plans to optimize minority recruitment. Additional details on recruitment plans may be provided in the Human Subjects section of the application.. Prospective recruitment plans should be established for each project and the PD/PI should indicate how outreach into the community at the clinical sites, to referring physicians and patients will be encouraged, what actions and materials will be used to support recruitment of patients, and how patients will be included in the conception, planning and implementation of trials so that a strong partnership between investigators and patients can serve as a foundation for successful trial recruitment and retention.
D) Leveraging Local Clinical Research Resources Plan
The PD/PI should describe how local clinical research resources such as equipment, space and research staff will relate to the NCC activities, and, if applicable, how the network will integrate Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) resources. In such a case, a description of the GCRC or CTSA and how the applicant proposes interacting with it should be included, as well as letter of agreement from either the GCRC/CTSA Program Director or PD/PI included in the “Letters of Support” section of the application. Having a GCRC or CTSA at the institution is not a requirement for application.
E) Plan to Increase the Quality and Efficiency of the Clinical Research Enterprise at the Clinical Sites
Applicants should discuss their (and their institutions') willingness to establish master trial agreements with each RCC, so that the per-patient cost associated with specific network protocols can be efficiently administered. Applicants and their institutions should also indicate their willingness to coordinate a central IRB model. If applicable, describe additional measures that would increase the efficiency of ongoing NINDS-funded clinical research, even if outside of the network. Describe other plans to increase the quality and efficiency of clinical trials. Describe how protocol adherence and data quality will be maximized in collaboration with the clinical sites.
F) Performance Monitoring and Potential Interventions Plan
For new and potentially also for ongoing NINDS-funded trials, the application should describe how the NCC will monitor performance and collect data on start-up, recruitment and retention, as well as data quality for NINDS-funded clinical trials at the RCC and stroke center sites.
G) Training Plan
The network presents a rich environment for young investigators to be exposed to and to develop additional research skills and to assist them in progressing to more senior status. The applicant should describe their plans to reach out to young investigators and how they may be selected for training. Applicants should identify the names of faculty members who will serve as the training director at their site with their experience (and the site's history) in mentoring clinical fellows in stroke. Lastly, applicants should identify any unique resources or opportunities that could further the training effort of fellows trained at funded-sites within the network.
H) Clinical Coordination and Project Management Plan
Leading the NCC will be a complex and time-consuming undertaking and applicants must have the necessary experience and expertise to coordinate multi-center clinical trials in pediatric and adult patients with stroke. Therefore, a listing of current and up to five of the most recently completed trials that the NCC applicant has coordinated must also be provided in the 30 page Research Strategy.
Applicants should describe the SOPs they have in place and the processes they currently apply when coordinating multi-center projects. Applicants are encouraged to provide an example of a standard operating procedures (SOPs) used by the NCC in the implementation of multi-center clinical trials, including, but not limited to SOPs describing regulatory document collection, IRB approvals, study drug management, procedures to minimize bias and maintain blinding, recruitment plans, retention plans, data sharing plans, safety monitoring plans, etc., as an appendix in the application. Plans directly related to participants such as adverse event monitoring may be included in the Human Subjects section as necessary.
In this section, applicants should include a table with a brief description of current and up to five most recently completed trials that their center has coordinated, indicating:
I) Contribution to potential future network trials
Applicants should indicate their willingness to work within the network to propose timely clinical trials to the NINDS. Investigators awarded a NCC grant will be requested to provide a record of their contributions on each annual progress report on its collaboration to bring meritorious trials into the network.
To demonstrate their capabilities, applicants should include a brief paragraph to describe if and how they could contribute (i.e., design, leadership, expertise, etc.) to potential future trials of: a) an adaptive trial to identify which of the currently available intravenous thrombolytic drugs, either alone or in combination with other strategies, are superior for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within the current time window; b) a trial to determine whether ischemic stroke patients with evidence of tissue at risk on acute CT or MR imaging will benefit from intravenous or endovascular reperfusion therapy in an extended time window; and c) a stroke recovery study of a critical biomarker or an impairment-focused treatment during the initial 3 months after stroke. Applicants should also comment on their capacity for pediatric studies.
Letters of Support:
As applicable, the applicant should include a letter of agreement from the PD/PI of the institutional CTSA indicating how local clinical research resources such as equipment, space and research staff will be integrated into the NCC activities.
Resource Sharing Plan
Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following modification:
Appendix: Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. The following items are recommended for inclusion in the Appendix:
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the deadline to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.
Organizations must submit applications via Grants.gov, the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies. Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the deadline in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management (SAM). Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NINDS. Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-10-115.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
Does the PD/PI have a track record of working collaboratively? Does the PD/PI have a track record in successfully coordinating multicenter stroke trials? Is there evidence of a strong relationship between neurology, emergency medicine, interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery stroke rehabilitation, and pediatric neurology? Does the PD/PI have a track record in successfully implementing and completing stroke clinical trials? Do the applicants have a track record of developing and submitting stroke clinical trial grant applications to the NINDS? Is there evidence of experience in and willingness of the various stroke-related services and preclinical stroke laboratories to participate appropriately in a collaborative program as described in this FOA?
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses
well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project?
Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success
presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the
strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed?
If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Are interactions/communications between investigators at the institution clearly described and creatively optimized? Is the investigator willing and likely sufficiently available to participate in network-wide meetings, teleconferences, and SC working groups?
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
Does the institution show commitment to the PD/PI by providing departmental and institutional letters that demonstrate support via such means as additional protected time, departmental research leadership position, facilities, space, or resources for the PD/PI?,
Does the application provide assurance that the institution will be able to coordinate and utilize a central IRB of record as well as standard network master trial agreement for per patient cost of clinical programs? Does the applicant have a track record of achieving relatively short trial start-up times with regard to contract negotiations, IRB approval times, and study personnel training?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does
not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR
Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human
subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their
participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to
subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the
subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data
and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children
When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Applications from Foreign Organizations
Select Agent Research
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans
Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan; 2) Sharing Model Organisms; and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), convened by the NINDS Scientific Review Branch, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council.
The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH
will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as
described in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to the DUNS, SAM Registration, and Transparency Act requirements as noted on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.
Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and
not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
grant administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92 (Part 92 is
applicable when State and local Governments are eligible to apply), and other
HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and the NIH as defined below.
The NCC PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual awardee. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and DHHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the annual Non-Competing Progress Report (PHS 2590 or RPPR) and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity
and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission, downloading or navigating forms)
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726
GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and process, finding NIH grant resources)
eRA Commons Help Desk (Questions regarding eRA Commons registration, tracking application status, post submission issues)
Phone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
Dr. Scott Janis
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Examine your eRA Commons account for review assignment and contact information (information appears two weeks after the submission due date).
Tijuanna DeCoster, MPA
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.