This Program Announcement expires on November 30, 2004, unless reissued.
PLASTICITY OF HUMAN STEM CELLS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
Release Date: December 3, 2001
PA NUMBER: PA-02-025
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
(http://www.ninds.nih.gov)
National Institute on Aging
(http://www.nia.nih.gov)
National Institute of Mental Health
(http://www.nimh.nih.gov)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
(http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov)
THIS PA USES "MODULAR GRANT" AND "JUST-IN-TIME" CONCEPTS. MODULAR
INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE USED FOR RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS UP TO $250,000 PER
YEAR. MODULAR BUDGET INSTRUCTIONS ARE PROVIDED IN SECTION C OF THE PHS 398
(REVISION 5/2001) AVAILABLE AT
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html.
PURPOSE
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the
National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Mental Health
(NIMH) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) invite
applications for studies on the plasticity and behavior of human stem cells,
and regulation of their replication, differentiation and function in the
nervous system. Because of their ability to generate neurons and glia, stem
cells are promising candidates for the development of cellular and genetic
therapies for neurological disorders, including congenital,
neurodevelopmental, neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, as well
as neuroregulatory problems in heart, lung, and blood diseases, and sleep
disorders. Animal studies demonstrate that stem or progenitor cells can be
derived from a variety of tissues and from hosts of different ages; however,
the requirements and potential for differentiation of each cell type appears
to be unique. In a recently-issued Program Announcement (PA-01-078)), NINDS
and other institutes at NIH invited studies to investigate the influence of
extrinsic signals in the nervous system on the biology of non-human stem
cells. Development of treatments for human conditions ultimately will require
understanding the biology of human stem cells. To achieve this goal, NINDS,
NIA, NIMH and NHLBI encourage applications to study the fundamental
properties of all classes of human stem cells, and to confirm, extend, and
compare the behavior of human stem cells that are derived from different
sources and ages or exposed to different regimes in vitro and in vivo. Of
high priority are studies to develop methods for identifying, isolating and
characterizing specific human precursor populations at intermediate stages of
differentiation into neurons and glia. Because our current understanding of
stem cell biology comes mainly from studies conducted on murine stem cells, a
comparison between human and non-human cells will be crucial for translating
the results of animal studies to clinical trials. This Program Announcement
(PA) invites applications for support of research that characterizes
cellular, molecular and genetic mechanisms that allow human stem and
precursor cells to express plasticity and lineage choices. Projects that
address comparisons between different classes of human stem cells, and
between human and non-human stem cells would also be directly relevant to
this PA.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Background
Stem cell research offers enormous potential for treating a host of
congenital, developmental, psychiatric or degenerative diseases for which
there are no cures. In animal studies, multipotent progenitor cells from many
different sources have been reported to generate cells with neuronal or glial
properties, raising expectations that they could be used to replace lost
neurons and glia, repair defective circuits, and restore functions
compromised by abnormal development, age, physical damage or disease. In
addition to cell and tissue therapy, the ability to selectively produce one
or more differentiated cell types at will from pluripotent stem cells would
be of clinical importance in investigating the effects of drugs and
environmental factors on differentiation and cell function in the human
nervous system.
Major challenges have to be overcome before any human cells can be harnessed
and translated to meaningful treatments for patients. These challenges
include identifying the optimal type of stem cell or stem cell derivative for
specific assays and therapies for individual disorders, harvesting and
growing sufficient quantities of the appropriate cell type, deciding the best
therapeutic strategy for each condition to be treated, and assessing the
often-unexpected side effects that may arise when such versatile cells are
introduced into a patient. In addition, examples of the enormous plasticity
exhibited by stem cells raise fundamental questions about the comparative
potential of precursor cells derived from different sources and different
stages of development; the nature of the conditions that regulates stem cell
behavior; and the genetic, molecular and cellular mechanisms that result in
functional integration within the host nervous system over the lifespan of
the organism.
Of the many types of progenitor cells competent to develop neuronal and glial
features, embryonic stem (ES) cells, derived from embryos at the blastocyst
stage, may have the broadest natural potential because, during development,
they normally produce all the cells of an organism. These pluripotent cell
lines are characterized by nearly unlimited self-renewal and differentiation
capacity. During differentiation in vitro, mouse and human ES cells express
properties of mature tissues such as muscles, several classes of neurons,
glia, pancreatic islet cells, cartilage and blood. When transplanted into the
central nervous system (CNS), ES cells that have been coaxed along an
oligodendrocytic lineage will form myelin and ensheath axons. Some improved
function was reported in rodent models of demyelination and spinal cord
injury that received these ES cell-derived transplants. However, how the
transplanted cells contributed to the restoration of function is unclear.
Another source of progenitors are neural stem cells that are derived from
neurogenic regions in the developing and adult CNS. They integrate seamlessly
into the host when transplanted into the developing nervous system, but their
fate appears highly dependent upon the local environment that they encounter.
This is particularly true when these cells are introduced into the adult CNS.
Cells that can become neurons in the hippocampus, generate only astrocytes
when placed into the spinal cord. Under appropriate conditions, some neural
stem cells can even develop into non-neural cell types.
Of particular interest are recent reports from a number of investigators that
stem cells present in adult, non-neuronal tissues also appear to show
surprising plasticity or versatility. For example, under specific culture
conditions, bone marrow stromal cells can give rise to cells with neuronal or
glial features. Following bone marrow transplantation, donor-derived cells
could be found in many tissues including the CNS, skeletal muscle, liver,
heart, vascular endothelia, and bone. One group reports that systemic
injections of bone marrow stromal cells resulted in significant functional
recovery in a rodent model of ischemia. Before we can design therapies using
human stem cells, we must understand how "plastic" or malleable are these
different classes of cells, the environmental cues that drive their choice of
fates, and how reversible are these fates.
For unknown reasons, select populations of cells are destroyed in specific
neurological disorders and diseases - dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's
Disease (PD), cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's Disease(AD), motor neurons
in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and myelinating oligodendrocytes in
Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Because there is great diversity of neurons and
glia, studies to develop treatments for these and other diseases with less
well defined etiologies will require the characterization and acquisition of
unique populations of neurons and glia. While dopaminergic neurons clearly
are the target of studies on PD, defining the specific features of the
dopaminergic neurons needed to treat PD is less obvious. Each neuronal and
glial phenotype is defined by a constellation of morphological, biochemical,
genetic, and electro-physiological properties, and the functional
significance/impact of a neuronal population depends on connectivity with
appropriate afferent and efferent populations. It is necessary to determine
the particular stem cell and protocol to generate a differentiated phenotype
that best replicates the significant properties of the endogenous target
cell. This requires direct comparison in the same in vitro and in vivo assay
systems between the numerous types of stem and progenitor cells. The easiest
features to evaluate include morphology, biochemical and gene expression, and
physiology. Less often described are quantification of protein and gene
levels, acquisition and maintenance of phenotype over time, cell division and
migration, and the simultaneous tracking of multiple properties in a
population of cells. Least studied is the functional integration and
functional consequences of the transplanted cells in the host, and the long-
term behavior of the transplanted population within the host. At present we
know little about the biology and comparative differentiation potential of
different types of stem cells, or their potential for use in developing
treatments for neurological disease.
Much of our understanding of the neural potential of different stem cells
comes from animal studies. It is still unclear if the many varieties of stem
cells described in animals are also present in humans, or how they can be
harvested, expanded, purified and induced to differentiate into neurons and
glia. We lack an understanding of the conditions required to support the
development of human cells along specific lineages in a reproducible manner.
Because most studies on human stem cells have been conducted in culture, it
is unclear whether the differentiated cells will persist, how they will
behave in the environment of the healthy brain, or their potential in the
nervous system altered by trauma, disease, or age. A few studies, carried
out in animal models of dysfunction, hold promise that differentiated donor
cells can maintain neuronal markers for long periods in vivo. However, there
is as yet no demonstration that these cells integrate functionally into the
existing nervous system of the host and contribute to behavioral recovery.
There are few studies on the long-term fates of any transplanted cells within
the nervous system or at other sites within the host.
Objectives and Scope
This Program Announcement is intended to promote studies of human stem cell
biology and the regulation and control of stem cells in the nervous system.
Of special interest are research efforts on cellular, molecular and genetic
mechanisms that influence the lineage choices of human stem cells, and the
development of methods for isolating specific cell populations, and studies
that demonstrate or enhance the safety of human stem cells in treatments for
neurological conditions. The following examples illustrate areas that are of
high interest; other innovative projects are also encouraged.
o Comparison of the mitotic potential and fates of different types of human
stem and progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo in the CNS.
o Comparison of the structural and functional integration of different types
of human progenitor cells into the healthy versus the injured or diseased
host nervous system.
o Determination of the functional properties of human progenitor cells
implanted during progressive developmental stages of the host CNS, and with
aging.
o Comparison of the functional properties of human stem and precursor cells
implanted at different stages of differentiation along neuronal or glial
lineages.
o Comparison of the behavior of human stem cells with that of their non-
human counterparts in vitro and in vivo.
o Investigation of the ability of different human stem cells to revert to a
more plastic, multipotent state, under normal conditions and following
injury.
o Examination of changes in gene and protein expression as human stem and
progenitor cells differentiate along specific neuronal and glial lineages.
o Identification of signals, signaling pathway components and
transcriptional factors that regulate the fate(s) of transplanted human stem
cells and their derivatives.
o Development of assays and markers that permit accurate and reliable
characterization of the state of differentiation of human stem or neural
precursor cells.
o Development of methods for identifying, isolating and enriching select
human precursor populations, intermediate states, and differentiated neuronal
and glial phenotypes.
o Development of a public database of gene expression patterns for human
stem cells as they differentiate and mature into specific neuronal and glial
fates.
o Development of informatics models that integrate the results from studies
of different human and non-human stem and neural precursor cell types.
o Use of animal model systems of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders
for screening and comparing the functional capabilities of implanted human
stem cells and their progeny.
o Assessment of the long-term fates and the consequences of transplanted
human cells and their progeny in the nervous system, and in ectopic sites
within the host.
o Assessment of the connectivity and integration of transplanted cells
within the host nervous system and across the lifespan.
o Assessment and comparison of the immune responses generated by different
human stem cells and their progeny in the host.
o Assessment of the behavior of host cells in response to the short-term and
long-term presence of transplanted human stem cells and/or their derivatives.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs): Criteria for federal funding of
research on hESCs can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html.
All cell lines that meet these criteria and are therefore eligible for research
with federal funding are identified and registered in the NIH Human Embryonic
Stem Cell Registry (http://escr.nih.gov). NIH has established a website
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/stem_cell_faqs.htm) that provides information
in the form of answers to frequently asked questions about implementation
issues for human embryonic stem cell research (see also:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-014.html). Only
research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem
Cell Registry will be eligible for funding. Each approved cell line is
specifically identified by an NIH code in the Registry. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to provide in their application the official
NIH identifier(s)for the hESC line(s)that they will use as found in the NIH
Registry (http://escr.nih.gov). Applications that do not provide this
information will be returned without review.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
The Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21) mechanism and the Research Project
(R01) grant mechanism will be used to support projects under this Program
Announcement(PA). Under these mechanisms, responsibility for the planning,
direction, and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the
applicant. The proposed project period during which the research will be
conducted should adequately reflect the time required to accomplish the
stated goals and should be no more than 5 years for R01 grants. The R21
grants are one-time awards to support innovative, high impact research
projects that would either 1) generate pilot data to assess the feasibility
of a novel avenue of investigation, 2)involve high risk experiments that
could lead to a breakthrough in a particular field, or 3) demonstrate the
feasibility of new technologies that could have major impact in a specific
area. For this PA, participating NIH institutes will use the NINDS guidelines
for the R21 mechanism, which can be found at
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/funding/r21guidelines.htm. As described in these
guidelines, R21 proposals are limited to two years with a maximum of $125,000
direct costs per year. This program is appropriate both for new investigators
seeking to establish independent research careers and for established
investigators wishing to explore new areas of neuroscience or develop novel
technologies.
Specific application instructions have been modified to reflect "MODULAR
GRANT" and "JUST-IN-TIME" streamlining efforts that have been adopted by the
NIH. Complete and detailed instructions and information on Modular Grant
applications have been incorporated into the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001).
Additional information on Modular Grants can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-
profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible
agencies of the Federal government. Racial/ethnic minority individuals,
women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as principal
investigators.
INQUIRIES
Inquiries are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions
from potential applicants is welcome.
Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:
Arlene Y. Chiu, Ph.D.
Program Director,
Repair and Plasticity Program
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Neuroscience Center, Room 2206, MSC 9525
Bethesda, MD 20892-9525
Telephone: (301) 496-1447
FAX: (301) 480-1080
Email: chiua@ninds.nih.gov
Bradley C. Wise, Ph.D.
Program Director, Fundamental Neuroscience
Neuroscience and Neuropsychology of Aging Program
National Institute on Aging
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3C307 MSC 9205
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Telephone: (301) 496-9350
FAX: (301) 496-1494
Email: wiseb@nia.nih.gov
Beth-Anne Sieber, Ph.D.
Chief, Developmental Neurobiology Program
National Institute of Mental Health
Neuroscience Center, Room 7186, MSC 9641
Bethesda, MD 20892-9641
Telephone: (301) 443-5288
FAX: (301) 402-4740
Email: sieberb@helix.nih.gov
John W. Thomas, Ph.D.
Blood Diseases Program
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute
Two Rockledge Centre, Room 10154, MSC 7950
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-7950
Telephone: (301) 435-0050
FAX: (301) 451-5453
Email: ThomasJ@nhlbi.nih.gov
Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:
Rita Sisco
Grants Management Specialist
Grants Management Branch , DER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Neuroscience Center, Room 3290, MSC 9537
Telephone: (301) 496-9231
FAX: (301) 402-0219
Email: rr46w@nih.gov
Linda Whipp
Grants Management Officer
Grants and Contracts Management Office
National Institute on Aging
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2N212, MSC 9205
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Telephone: (301) 496-1472
FAX: (301) 402-3672
Email: lw17m@nih.gov
Diana S. Trunnell
Grants Management Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6115, MSC 9605
Bethesda, MD 20892-9605
Telephone: (301) 443-2805
FAX: (301) 443-6885
Email: Diana_Trunnell@nih.gov
Suzanne A. White
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7154 (MSC 7926)
Bethesda, MD 20892-7926
Telephone: (301) 435-0166
FAX: (301) 480-3310
Email: WhiteSa@NHLBI.NIH.GOV
APPLICATION PROCEDURES
The PHS 398 research grant application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001) at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html must be used in
applying for these grants and will be accepted at the standard application
deadlines (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/dates.htm) as indicated in the
application kit. This version of the PHS 398 is available in an interactive,
searchable format. Beginning January 10, 2002, however, the NIH will return
applications that are not submitted on the 5/2001 version. For further
assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone 301/435-0714, Email:
GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
Applicants planning to submit an investigator-initiated new (type 1),
competing continuation (type 2), competing supplement, or any amended/revised
version of the preceding grant application types requesting $500,000 or more
in direct costs for any year are advised that he or she must contact the
Institute or Center (IC) program staff before submitting the application,
i.e, as plans for the study are being developed. Furthermore, the application
must obtain agreement from the IC staff that the IC will accept the
application for consideration for award. Finally, the applicant must
identify, in a cover letter sent with the application, the staff member and
Institute or Center who agreed to accept assignment of the application.
The current policy on accepting applications requesting $500K or more
requires PIs to seek agreement from IC staff at least 6 weeks prior to
submission date. Refer to the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, October 16,
2001 at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-004.html.
The title and number of the program announcement must be typed on line 2 of
the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked.
Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the
Checklist, and five signed photocopies in one package to:
CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040, MSC 7710
BETHESDA, MD 20892-7710
BETHESDA, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS
The modular grant concept establishes specific modules in which direct costs
may be requested as well as a maximum level for requested budgets. Only
limited budgetary information is required under this approach. The
just-in-time concept allows applicants to submit certain information only when
there is a possibility for an award. It is anticipated that these changes will
reduce the administrative burden for the applicants, reviewers and NIH staff.
The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html is to be used in
applying for these grants, with modular budget instructions provided in
Section C of the application instructions.
REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral
guidelines. Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical
merit by an appropriate scientific review group convened in accordance with
the standard NIH peer review procedures. As part of the initial merit review,
all applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in
which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit,
generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed,
assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the
appropriate national advisory council or board.
Review Criteria
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In
the written comments reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects
of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed
research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each
of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall
score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that the
application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely
to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For
example, for R01 applications, an investigator may propose to carry out
important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move
a field forward.
(1) Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims
of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced?
What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that
drive this field?
(2) Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider
alternative tactics?
(3) Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or
method? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge
existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
(4) Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited
to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience
level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)?
(5) Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be
done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments
take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ
useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional
support.
(6) For R21 applications: Could these high risk experiments lead to a
breakthrough in the field? Could the proposed studies demonstrate the
feasibility of new technologies that could have a major impact in a specific
area?
In addition to the above criteria, in accordance with NIH policy, all
applications will also be reviewed with respect to the following:
o The adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities and their
subgroups, and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the
research. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be
evaluated.
o The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the
proposed research
o The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals or the
environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project
proposed in the application.
AWARD CRITERIA
Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:
o scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
o availability of funds
o programmatic priorities.
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and
their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research
projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating
that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or
the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization
Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT "NIH
Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical
Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and
Contracts on October 9, 2001
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html);
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of
clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with
the new OMB standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase
III clinical trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles
and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a)
all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of
plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by
sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable;
and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21)
must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by
the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.
This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for
receipt dates after October 1, 1998.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the
"NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in
Research Involving Human Subjects" that was published in the NIH Guide for
Grants and Contracts, March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL
address: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html
Investigators also may obtain copies of these policies from the program staff
listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant
information concerning the policy.
URLS IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES
All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within
specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH
solicitation, internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide
information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation
to view the Internet sites. Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may
be compromised when they directly access an Internet site.
REQUIRED EDUCATION IN THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS
NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants
for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human
subjects. This policy announcement is available in the NIH Guide for Grants
an Contracts, June 5, 2000 (Revised August 25, 2000), available at:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to
provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a
project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2)
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action
that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed
through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope
of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this PA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include
information about this in the budget justification section of the
application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure
informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the
potential for wider use of data collected under this award.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS
led national activity for setting priority areas. This Program Announcement
(PA), " Plasticity of human stem cells in the nervous system," is related to
several of the priority areas including working toward improving life
expectancy and quality of life of patients disabled by neurological
disorders. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010"at
http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS
This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
93.853, 93.866, 93.242 and 93.839. Awards are made under authorization of
sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241
and 284) and administered under NIH grants policies and Federal Regulations
42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. This program is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health
Systems Agency review.
The NIH Grants Policy Statement is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm. This document includes
general information about the grant application and review process;
information on the terms and conditions that apply to NIH grants and
cooperative agreements; and a listing of pertinent offices and officials at
the NIH.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant and contract recipients to provide a
smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In
addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking
in certain facilities (or in some cases, and portion of a facility) in which
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early
childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of
the American people.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
|
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
|
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
|
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
|
||||
|
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files. |
||||||||||